It’s OK To Be NA

I’ve tried, but I just can’t get as excited as everyone else about forced induction by the way of turbocharging.

Sure, there are good reasons turbochargers are popular. If you want to go fast you need power, and turbos happen to be rather good at producing it. But I believe there’s a different way, a purer path to pursue performance car bliss. Natural Aspiration.

Indeed, during any performance build there’s a point where forced induction needs to be considered. If you’re a smart cookie, you’ve decided your performance goals and how to reach them before the first spanner is turned. If you’re like me, you have an idea of how much power you’d like to make, but the path forward is unsure and involves lots of vague research, hypothesising and experimentation. This is fun, but of questionable effectiveness.

2020 Toyota Starlet Turbos Speedhunters by Paddy McGrath-74

The reason we need to consider forced induction is the law of diminishing returns. The law of diminishing returns is an economic theory, but applies perfectly to our project cars where the limiting factor of progress is how well we manage our funds. Simply put: assuming a sensible approach to tuning, your first dollar spent will buy you more horsepower than the ten-thousandth. Turbo or NA, it’s why one of the most popular modifications across the board is an improved exhaust; it’s a relatively cheap way to free up some performance.


But here’s the problem – an upgraded cat-back exhaust on an atmospheric engine like the 370Z’s VQ might net you a useful 10 horsepower in the midrange, and a couple extra up top if you’re lucky. The same mods – a mid-pipe and muffler – are a guarantee of 25 horsepower on an R35’s VR. Percentage-wise, these are still both looking like good-value mods.


Your next step might be an off-the-shelf tune to make the most of your shiny new exhaust. The 370Z nets another 10hp, but the GT-R nabs a whopping 70hp increase on the dyno. ‘And she’ll make forty more with an intake,’ the tuner says. While Mr. Z is scratching his head about his next 5 or 10hp, GT-R-san has a good 200hp more in just bolt-ons before he obliterates his dual-clutch transmission leaving the car meet (dyno chart still on the dashboard, but that’s a different story).


Turbocharging that 370Z won’t be cheap, but it will be cheaper than trying to make the same amount of power without boost. It’s a losing battle; an NA engine can only ever make the most of whatever oxygen density happens to be in the atmosphere (more at sea level, less up high), whereas even a basic turbo setup will have two to three times atmospheric pressure to play with.


But I would suggest that although all the above is true, it doesn’t actually apply to most of us. We don’t drive these old cars because they are the fastest, most reliable or cost efficient options – they are often the opposite. Just ask our own Mark Riccioni about how emotion can trump logic every time.

Now, there are a few situations where a turbo is the only option, so let’s get those out of the way…

WTAC-2018-Stylized-blakejones-speedhunters (111 of 114)

You want bragging rights.

If you have aspirations of putting a power figure in your forum signature (or Instagram bio, it is 2020), install a turbo. If you want to put dyno sheets in your front window at car shows, install a turbo. I will silently judge you, but you can tell yourself it’s because I’m jealous of your peak power figure.

WTAC_Integra_Everingham_Speedhunters_ (48)

You are in a racing class which allows them without penalty.

You will not win your class at the World Time Attack Challenge without a turbo. Install one.

However, there are many racing series that, in an effort to keep a cap on costs and ensure performance parity, employ a ‘Balance of Performance’ (BOP) strategy, which will limit the outright power advantage of a turbocharged car. In this scenario, sticking with something naturally aspirated can come with significant packaging, reliability and drivability advantages.

WTAC-2018-Stylized-blakejones-speedhunters (82 of 114)

Your car is already turbocharged.

I’m not sure why you’re reading this. Bored? Regretful? If you already have a turbo, it’s imperative that you continue to crank up the boost until things start to break. Go hop in your car and enjoy your whistles and bangs – while they last!

If you’re still with me, I’ll go ahead and assume you and I share something in common. You have a project car that is not turbocharged. My 1992 Honda NSX is a prime example. I would like to make it faster, but is a turbo really the way to go?


There’s precedent for a boosted NSX. Honda experimented with turbochargers on a prototype of the NSX before deciding it added too much weight and complexity compared to the NA 3.0L which eventually made it into production.

Then five years after the road car launched, Honda’s engineers again bolted a turbo to each bank and shipped two cars to Le Mans to take on the McLaren F1, although neither were classified finishers due to mechanical issues. The third car – a naturally aspirated NSX (driven by none other than Keiichi Tsuchiya) – finished 8th overall, taking home gold in the GT2 class. Who said what about reliability?


This hasn’t stopped the aftermarket from boosting the C30A and C32B variants of the Honda V6. Japanese tuner Esprit has proven the V6 capable of 700hp and 53-second laps at Tsukuba.

The Tomiyoshi Racing NSX was lapping Tsukuba in the 56-second range back in 2011, making it one of the fastest time attack cars ‘despite’ its naturally aspirated powerplant producing ‘just’ 400hp. Any excuse to watch that video again…

But as the years marched on and times continued to drop, 400hp wasn’t going to cut the wasabi mustard regardless of how much speed Hannita-san could carry through the final hairpin. A BorgWarner EFR 9180 was fitted, and before you can say ‘Kyushu Danji’ the Tomiyoshi Racing team had lopped almost three seconds from their previous best time.

Honda also eventually relented; the new NSX features a twin-turbocharged 3.5L V6 (plus hybrid power) which makes it very, very fast – but a bit two-dimensional. It’s received a lukewarm reception from the market despite presenting like a poor man’s Porsche 918 Spyder in many ways. Do you think this would be the case if Honda had used the NA V10 which had been in development for the stillborn NSX replacement of the late 2000s? I doubt it.


Supercharging is also an option. In fact, for the original NSX it is far more popular to bolt up a belt-driven turbine due to the relative ease of installation on top of the longitudinal V6.


The NSX was well ahead of its time, and blessed with a stiff and tractable chassis which will happily deploy up to around 400hp assuming tyres and brakes are upgraded to cope with the increased demands of acceleration and deceleration.


My goal of matching the power-to-weight of a 996 GT3 would be ticked off rather easily with boost, and I could legitimately set my sights on Porsche’s latest GT3 – the 500hp 991.2 – on an internally-standard, 3.0-litre engine.


But I can say (with reasonable confidence) that is not the path I will take.


I intend to follow in the footsteps of guys like Masa Shinbori of Advance instead.


Masa has continued his father’s work to perfect the NSX, rather than altogether change it. If we get metaphorical and look at the Advance demo car as a sword passed between generations, Masa has decided to sharpen it religiously and learned how to wield it, as opposed to replacing the original blade with something altogether more deadly.

Some of the cars that come out of the Advance workshop are so far from standard it might seem like they don’t abide by this rule, but I’ll attempt to explain the difference as I see it.


A clear definition of ‘great character’ from the driver’s seat is elusive, but like Justice Stewart famously observed about artistic nudity vs. obscenity: “I perhaps could never define it, but I know it when I see it.”


I’d argue that the way in which an engine develops its power is the most important factor in determining a car’s character, followed closely by how the engine sounds. Everything else – steering weight, brake pedal feel, seating position, accelerative ability – is of much lesser importance individually, and poor performance in one or more areas can be forgiven in the presence of an iconic engine – the Lexus LFA and its tragic electronic gearshift comes to mind. Once a car is no longer sold new, its absolute speed matters less than its ability to offer the owner a unique and visceral experience.


In stock form, I love the way the NSX makes power. It has torque from low RPM which continues to build and build towards a genuinely feisty top end. An 8,200rpm limit is still nothing to be sneezed at 30 years on.


As far as engine layouts go, a V6 isn’t all that exciting, but Honda deployed VTEC and VVIS (Variable Volume Induction System) to ensure a linear power curve, and futuristic (for the time) materials ensured a lightweight, low-friction reciprocating mechanism which gave response and top-end power. The end result is that every millimetre of pedal travel makes a difference, and every 1,000 RPM has a different story to tell. In my opinion, this is worth preserving.


Turbo engines with this sort of character are much harder to come by. Most that I’ve driven feel and sound very monotonous, regardless of what RPM they are at, and the worst offenders (looking at you, BMW B58) actually offer less performance at the top of their rev range. I’ll believe Chris Harris when he writes that the 488 Pista’s turbo V8 offers ‘zing’ at the top end, but it is telling that he compliments Ferrari for making the engine “feel as un-turbocharged as possible”.


In standard form the NSX has a nice growl under hard acceleration, but the engine was deliberately muzzled by Honda’s engineers who were insistent the car should be as quiet as an Accord for daily and grand touring duties. Like most classics, Project NSX is far from a daily driver, so a proper exhaust and induction resonator delete both boosted power and gave the V6 the doort it always deserved.


Every modification I have made and intend to make is guided by a similar principle: how can I iteratively add performance without sacrificing or significantly altering the character that I fell in love with originally. Thus I say ‘no thank you’ to turbochargers.


Thanks for indulging me thus far – perhaps this has given you the confidence to join me in giving forced induction the flick. But we all have moments of weakness, so I’ve prepared a cheat sheet of four reasons it’s OK to be NA. For greatest effect, hold a gaze with your reflection in a mirror and repeat each one 10 times in a loud, confident voice.

JM_0002_McLaren F1_1920

#1 The greatest driver’s car in the world is naturally aspirated.

If it’s good enough for Gordon Murray, it’s more than good enough for the rest of us. Not only is the McLaren F1’s engine renowned for its theatrics and absolute response, an NA V12 is still considered the best option in 2020 for Dr. Murray’s latest expression of the ultimate driver’s car, the T.50.


#2 Power is a Band-Aid for poor setup and driving. 

Nobody is impressed if you can only pass cars at the track on the straights. Pressing the gas pedal is not a talent.

#3 Weight and simplicity are key.

There’s a lot to be said for simplicity in a performance car. Turbines, blow-off valves, intercoolers and downpipes all add weight, take up space and generate significant amounts of heat, which limits how hard you can drive your car.

#4 Open ITB trumpets are cool.

No further explanation required.

Blake Jones
Instagram: blaketjones



Comments are closed.


by Oldest
by Best by Newest by Oldest

Great to see another semi-update from project NSX, it's been a pleasure to read and looking forward to some trumpets!


Thanks Joy - some nice and meaty updates on the horizon.


Nicely-written Blake, and I feel that 370Z comparison... I've got a lightly-modified G37, and despite being harangued to boost it every other week, I can't justify dropping $30k on twin turbos or $15k on a supercharger to make it happen, only to start breaking everything else behind the engine. Not so much a question of maintaining "purity", so much as... well, honestly, it's fast enough for me.

And yet, as much as you've gone the traditional driver-engagement route and binned your torque-converter auto in favour of a manual transmission, I'd much sooner put a newer V37 automatic in my car than a manual, and I can feel your judgement from here! hahahah


"It's fast enough" - probably the most sensible (and honest) words you will ever hear an enthusiast say, but so rare, haha.

I might judge the auto but you are within your rights to tell me to piss right off - if you enjoy it, that's all that matters.


+1 for that


The car always needed to be comfortable enough to drive to Sydney and back, but capable enough to carve corners on a mountain run; a balance between a GT car and a sports car, and I feel the paddle-shifted auto fits that bill better than a manual would - but you go enjoy the manual, don't let my lack of commitment stop you.


A scenic, meandering side road that simply arrives at accepting what an old NSX really is. Turbos? Nitrous? A geriatric in a tesla will still smoke you because they mistook the go pedal for the stop pedal, and it won't catch up to any actual racing drivers either.
N/A driving pleasure is the soul of the NSX. You can lie to yourself thinking changing your name to Takumi Schumacher, dropping the weight to sub 1000kg, and pushing 800+ reliable hp will win any races (how much money and stress and time will that take anyways?)... But a clear and focused vision will not only make the destination come cheaper and faster, it also makes the journey enjoyable and real. Solid article!


Thanks StraightR. You're spot on, electric cars make all our fussing about hp/torque seem a bit redundant when it comes to outright speed. But the joy of that process, fettling for more power and engagement... I believe that will live on! I'm sure most enthusiasts would try and tune a lawnmower engine if that's all we had access to lol.

Lolnope Notgonnahappen

Honestly I understand this. I have my Mk3 that has a turbo and the raw power I want ironically enough for a daily, but the Falcon and FC are both staying NA much to the consternation of my friends.

"You're L28 swapping the Falcon? Why not throw in a 2JZ-GTE and have boost? Why not put turbos on the FC?" And each time I have to remind them of the troubles I've had with the Supra.
But NA? NA means no premium gas, no turbos to leak oil, no boost lag (a nightmare I cannot escape no matter how hard I've tried with this damn CT-26), and higher redlines.
With the L28 swap it means I can keep carburetion without having to ensure the triple Mikuni setup can take the boost I want.

And in the end a simpler, lighter, more reliable engine with a more useable power band is my goal for both of these cars.
And frankly I wish more folks got that.


Wait, Nissan L28 in a Ford Falcon? Neat. The L28 delivers more smiles per buck than almost any other engine I can think of, so much character!


"#2 Power is a Band-Aid for poor setup and driving"

Tell that to Dai Yoshihara lol. This is a very vague sentence. Just like how people think NA and RWD are 'pure' pfft


I doubt Dai has poor setup and driving to put a bandaid on in the first place, being a professional racing driver. For the rest of us...


I'd rather have a big NA V8 than a turbo setup - it's so much simpler.

No need to worry about blowing up the engine due to detonation, you don't need a forged shortblock, you get good throttle response & exhaust note

Mark R Soo ⚛️

Love the write up.


what about positive diplacement superchargers? constant boost through the rev range.

betcha didnt think of those :)


Ya still need belt, pulleys, plumbing. And it robs few hp and add weight


Well written! My own journey with my car will align with this philosophy. Only thing I would add is NA power is increasingly rare while turbo motors will continue to grow in availability. P.S. great to see you active in the NSX FB groups.


I just wanted to say I loved your tribute to the "Senna washing NSX" picture.


Glad a fellow Senna fan spotted the homage!


Purity is something that's hard to find these days. With forced induction being so easy to get your hands on, a lot of people go for the 'easy' route for more power. However, while being a turbo WRX owner, the number 1 thing I want from my car is to enjoy it as much as I can. So it mustn't break down, be reliable and put a smile on my face. While power is fun, there aren't a lot of places you can really use it unless you're on a racetrack. So why not invest that time and money in the 'feeling' of the car instead?
Around 300hp is plenty for road use, it's more about how it brings the pony's so you can actually use them instead of half-throttling 600hp with a big single turbo. Finetuning the handling makes your car a much happier place to be in.


Imho, N/A setup can only be enjoyable on something which has more than 5 pots in it. Not that I'm hating N/A BEAMS in a KE70 (my dream setup, lol). But making enjoyable 300hp N/A on 5 or lower pots seems require more headache and money


You have the optimum NSX car-washing technique dialled in!


Most enjoyabel story I've read in ages. I keep getting woo'd by all things turbo, but NA all day. Thanks for reminding me.


This is a conversation I go through almost on a daily basis. I have a 240sx that still has the KA in it. Its mostly a track car and a well set up one at that. Every time I see another 240sx at the track that's boosted it has broken either leading to the owner missing sessions or cutting the weekend short. All the while I'm on track getting the most laps possible. Just doesn't seem worth it to me to deal with all the issues of boost just to go 10-15mph faster on a straight.


Blake you need a spare engine and trans or a second NSX dont settle get building, also why not build a turbo that just boosts low, slow, and steady to say 10,000rpm keep your comp ratio add water injection. As for reliable NA, thats great untill you run at red line all the time at every shift. Set ups are temporary states that exist for a moment then its time to start over, Yes I love NA for its throttle feel I just want 15,000 rpm


"Supercharging is also an option. In fact, for the original NSX it is far more popular to bolt up a belt-driven turbine due to the relative ease of installation on top of the longitudinal V6."

Sorry to correct you, but the run of the mill NSX's have transverse (east west) mounted engines. Also I like your take on NA tuned engines


Nicely written article and I agree that turbo systems add too much complexity and heat and thus have a significant and negative affect on reliability for a street driven car. I added a super charger system to my 4.6 Ford Mustang since its a lot simpler and cleaner install than a turbo and heat is not an issue either. Furthermore, the extra air density at higher elevations that the super charger delivers is an added bonus.


...In fact, for the original NSX it is far more popular to bolt up a belt-driven turbine due to the relative ease of installation on top of the longitudinal V6

There's your money hole right there. Trying to make a transverse set-up all longitudinal and such... :)


I've clearly spent too much time admiring the longitudinal set up in the Esprit car! Good catch.


Nice article, not trying to troll but you refer to BMW B58 engine while showing an N55....


The car is a toy. Not a a tool. Enjoy it as such. Don’t be concerned about the clock. In the end you will smile more.
Appreciate seeing my trumpets on Speedhunters. It’s all for fun. That’s how I build. Never taking it seriously of what I will do with the car. Just that I enjoy building and the sound of bouncing off the rev limiter.


Amen to that Ricko!


turbos are defeatist


N/A 4 LIFE! Only for the I4 Honda and Toyota engines though lol


"Do you think this would be the case if Honda had used the NA V10 which had been in development for the stillborn NSX replacement of the late 2000s? I doubt it."

Maybe, but at it's price point, you can cross-shop Porsche and a hand full of used exotic cars. Someone willing to spend nearly $200K for a car is often brand shopping.


As someone who has just sold there turbo powered ride for something with throttles and trumpets I will be wholeheartedly taking on board the catch phrases for my next NA is better discussion


I wish i could join you. I was seeking a BMW 128i for a long time then an almost showroom condition 135 with subtle OEM upgrades popped up and the dream of a high revving straight 6 NA died (hope it's temporary or at least that's what I'm trying to convince myself) with it. ITBs aside, the reliability was my first negative thoughts of turbos.
Regarding the BOP: As a fan of hill climb racing (and rallies), the "penalty" on the forced induction, engine capacity multiplier defines your class, is a good way to keep the NA alive. The crowd would love to hear the NA noises but no competitor will enter an event to gain the hearts of the audience only (excluding special runs for some iconic cars).


Blake. You complete me.



Yes! I agree totaly, i have a fwd racecar and there is nothing bettter then nice linear power with gas pedal that does what you want in an instant. Yes to get my 218hp V6 to 270hp took same amount of time and money as it was to get it to 400 with boost but i wouldnt change that if i went from begining again.
Great article!